Nature requires that we support ourselves and our children, but nowhere can it be shown that the social version of 'being human' is correct or wise or healthy for any individual or family. The 'socially normal' have no scientific basis by which to dictate how we express our humanity. In fact, the social hierarchy creates misery by denying food, clean water and shelter for millions of people; by polluting the environment, stealing resources, and bringing plants and wildlife to extinction. The Pharaohs of today care nothing for humanity, the planet or its future. This exploitation and careless destruction of all that is worthwhile on this planet, goes against the Asperger core: life matters.
Showing posts with label human evolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human evolution. Show all posts
Monday, April 7, 2014
Tuesday, March 11, 2014
Man at the top of a garbage heap, but closer to God.
When I watch popular programs on brain science or read
academic papers, I often become irritated. It is of course interesting and useful
to understand our most important organ, the generator of all things we subjectively
experience. But this fascinating excursion has taken on the dull drama of dismantling a Swiss
watch. The need to perfect what is a natural organic object becomes a desire to
tinker with and improve upon an organ that is not broken. Some human brains need
repair, or medical support, or special understanding, but in the extreme focus on imperfect brains, all brains have become
defective; the human brain is viewed as a malfunctioning electrical device and
not the core of a unique living being. The result is an explosion of pathologic
diagnosis and partitions of humans into normal, abnormal, treatable, sort of
treatable and intolerable - a pile of rejects created in the search for a perfect supernatural Man.
Researchers have become Lords of the Brain, the prescribers and manipulators of human destiny. Who are these individuals who have taken it upon themselves to decide which human beings are normal and which ought to be “tweeked, changed or fixed,” whether with drugs or biomedical engineering? Some scientists have abandoned life in order to create perfect obedient robots to replace an imperfect creature of evolution.
Researchers have become Lords of the Brain, the prescribers and manipulators of human destiny. Who are these individuals who have taken it upon themselves to decide which human beings are normal and which ought to be “tweeked, changed or fixed,” whether with drugs or biomedical engineering? Some scientists have abandoned life in order to create perfect obedient robots to replace an imperfect creature of evolution.
What a dangerous idea. Humans have been ‘perfecting’
the environment for thousands of years; perfecting domestic animals and plants,
overriding natural processes and polluting the earth. Know-it-alls have brought
us to the brink of self destruction and created a mess of social disharmony and physical suffering justified
by an archaic idea: God gave the earth to man to disrupt, loot and rape. Man at the top of a garbage heap, but
closer to God.
Labels:
abnormal psychology,
angry god,
Asperger,
Asperger thinking,
brain damage,
human evolution,
infant,
magical thinking,
mental health,
pseudoscience,
psychology,
religion,
social hierarchy
Saturday, March 1, 2014
Support for the Asperger Experience of Emotion as Pain
FROM:
Your Brain: Your Pharmacist. Brain prescribes opioids for rejection – and
rewards social acceptance with opioids! Posted on November 20, 2013 by consummatenovice
Hsu, D. et al. Response of the μ-opioid system to social rejection and acceptance. Molecular psychiatry 18, 1211–7 (2013).
For the last decade researchers have found
that emotional pain experienced from social rejection activates the same region
of the brain that physical pain activates – the pain center. (see previous post "The Science of Pain, Empathy and Emotion)
Scientists believe that
since mammals live in social groups that are crucial to survival, social
rejection is akin to a physical threat to our brain. A recent paper by Hsu et
al. from the University of Michigan, has now shown that the same opioid
receptors located in the brain’s pain center activated in response to physical
pain are also activated by emotional pain and that the more opioid response an
individual releases, the more that person scores high on the trait
“resiliency”. The study also found that the brain rewards social
acceptance with activation of opioid receptors located elsewhere in the brain.
The brain protects itself
from feeling too much physical pain by dosing itself with endogenous opioids.
It lets you feel pain so you know that whatever it is you are doing should
stop, but then alleviates its own pain by activating opioid receptors located
in the pain center of the brain. Presumably, this neat self-soothing mechanism
exists so when we get hurt we don’t just lie down and cry. (My personal experience points to the failure of this quenching or dampening of pain; the result is panic and anxiety that will escalate to unbearable levels.)
Given the
similarities in the experience of physical and emotional pain, scientists have
hypothesized that emotional pain also results in opioid receptor activation. In
this study, Hsu and Zubieta used a radiotracer specific for opioid receptors to
visualize the release of endogenous opioids with PET imaging in response to
stimuli.
Expectedly, rejected
subjects felt more “sad and rejected” and less “happy and accepted,” while
accepted subjects felt the opposite. Interestingly, subjects with high opioid
activity rated themselves as lower in the “sad and rejected” scale. These
findings suggest that individuals with a robust opioid response bounce back
more quickly in the face social rejection. This data corroborates a study by
Way et al. from 2009 which examined the differences in activation of the
brain’s pain center in response to social rejection between people who have a
normal opioid receptor gene and those who have a mutation in the receptor. The
mutated receptor is thought to have greatly reduced function and carriers of
this mutation have been shown to need greater amounts of opioids to treat
physical pain (ex: post-surgical pain). Way and Eisenberg saw that carriers of
the mutation had greater activation of the pain center than non-carriers.
These findings will
hopefully lead to new therapies and interventions with individuals suffering
from depression, social anxiety, and other psychological disorders.
Hsu, D. et al. Response of the μ-opioid system to social rejection and acceptance. Molecular psychiatry 18, 1211–7 (2013).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

