When I directly contradicted his strict
adherence to the triumvirate of science, technology and mathematics as the only
worthwhile human endeavors, he withdrew angrily. When I defended art, literature, foreign cultures and
music as areas of growing interest to me, I witnessed the rigid and
deranged male vision of superiority. I was swiftly demoted from being an
equal and temporarily cast out as one of them, a category that included all
lesser beings: women, minorities, artists, musicians, writers - literally,
anyone who was not a white male engineer or scientist. It hurt terribly and
compounding his vile attitude was the equally legitimate observation that my
father was not an unkind man. His kneejerk hatred toward categories of lesser
humans did not play out in daily life. He was helpful to neighbors and to
strangers regardless of category, to the point of exasperating my mother with
his generosity. He was an unrepentant chit-chatter with any and all who came
his way. I never heard an unfriendly word in his conversations unless the topic
turned to politics. It was then that the conservative white male monster emerged
and we had to drag him out of the situation to avoid a confrontation. In the
1950s such unhinged political behavior was rejected as out-of-bounds, but today
it has become main stream political behavior spread by rabid and irrational media
‘news.’
I was stuck with a schizoid model: Everything human was on the other side of the divide in my father’s male world. Female thoughts and opinions simply didn’t matter, and worse, formed some kind of cosmic threat to men. And yet, my father did not impose the standard “women are stupid, emotional, and should never attempt to think” regime on me, but encouraged my heresy. I think he also grasped that any censure of my particular interests would be fruitless. This conflict set me up for a lifelong interest in human behavior.
My hidden analysis of the family proved that both my father and mother were extreme cases of people who were locked into behavior they could neither understand nor modify. It turned out to be not that simple. Although their extremes were dysfunctional, each parent reflected common cultural beliefs promulgated by a particularly unhealthy supernatural script, which had been enacted over and over with tragic success for two millennia.
One of the highlights of my father's career in engineering was the monumental leap from slide rule to the HP 35. |
I was stuck with a schizoid model: Everything human was on the other side of the divide in my father’s male world. Female thoughts and opinions simply didn’t matter, and worse, formed some kind of cosmic threat to men. And yet, my father did not impose the standard “women are stupid, emotional, and should never attempt to think” regime on me, but encouraged my heresy. I think he also grasped that any censure of my particular interests would be fruitless. This conflict set me up for a lifelong interest in human behavior.
My hidden analysis of the family proved that both my father and mother were extreme cases of people who were locked into behavior they could neither understand nor modify. It turned out to be not that simple. Although their extremes were dysfunctional, each parent reflected common cultural beliefs promulgated by a particularly unhealthy supernatural script, which had been enacted over and over with tragic success for two millennia.
When I look back to my childhood I see it ironically. The painful dysfunctional predicament in which I found myself provided material for a favorite type of Asperger challenge. What a mess! I bet I can figure it out. I'm still working on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are encouraged but will be moderated. Thank-you.